So, a while back, my friend, Kari Espin, and I were planning a professional learning experience for teachers.  We were trying to come up with a way for them to reflect and intentionally consider what they had learned and how it applied to their classrooms.  In doing so, we developed an idea that we like to call the "perspective diamond" and I wanted to take some time to share the idea with you and how you might use it in your classroom.

First of all, a diamond (or rhombus), can be broken into two triangles and that is key for this classroom strategy.   Ask learners to consider two different perspectives.  This could be the perspectives of two different characters in a book, two perspectives of a conflict on the playground, or two perspectives of what was learned in class today...the possibilities are endless.  After both triangles are filled out (by the same learner or two different learners), they can be put together to form a "perspective diamond".  

One specific example of how this could be used in the classroom is as a reflection tool.  At the end of class, you could use the 3-2-1 strategy.  ln the largest part of the triangle, learners could document 3 things that they've learned, in the middle, they could document 2 connections that were made, and then at the top, they could share 1 question that they still have.  

After filling out their triangles, they could grab a partner and compare their triangles by creating a Perspective Diamond.  They might realize that they have the same questions or maybe something that they learned is what their partner is still wondering about.

This strategy can be utilized in so many ways.  It's a great way to implement Depth and Complexity using Multiple Perspectives and encourage critical thinking.  It encourages learners to be willing to see someone else's point of view and consider how it connects to their own.

I'm excited about sharing more about this strategy and how it can be utilized in a new book that will be released in the Fall 2022.  Until then, I'd love to hear how you are using or intend to use this strategy in your classroom.  Please share in the comments below.  

So often, those of us that share Genius Hour, talk about how amazing it is and what we did well.  However, the reality is that most of us did a lot of things wrong, too.  It's important to not only talk about what went well, but also what went wrong.  I know that I made several mistakes along the way and my hope is that sharing those mistakes might help someone else in their journey.  So, here it goes...five mistakes that I made as I began to implement Genius Hour and what I would do differently today.

1.  I didn't value productive struggle. 
What I Did: As I began to implement Genius Hour, I wanted my learners to be all in.  I also wanted their parents to be all in.  I quickly realized that they were going to struggle while working on their projects and I wasn't always going to be able to help.  In the beginning, I did all I could to prevent struggle and tried my best to have as many answers as I possibly could.  That was a terrible idea.  The reality is that it was only through allowing my learners to struggle that they were going to gain the skills and perseverance they would need beyond the walls of the classroom.  I had to learn that I didn't need to have all of the answers and had to restrain from trying to "save the day".  Instead, I needed to support them in their struggle and give them opportunities to independently work toward the solutions for the problems that they encountered.  As I began to realize the important role that productive struggle played in the Genius Hour process, I became more comfortable with my new role.  

What I Would Do Now: Today, I would help both my learners and their parents understand the importance of productive struggle and make it a priority from the start.  I would understand that my role as a teacher was not any less important because I wasn't providing answers.  Instead, it was different and I would have an even greater impact on who my learners would become beyond the walls of the classroom.

2.  I wasn't flexible with my timeline.
What I Did: When we first started Genius Hour, I explained to my learners that they would complete one project each semester.  In doing so, I was dictating how long their projects should take.  This was a mistake as it limited many of my learners in so many ways.  Some of them needed more time while others could have completed 2 or 3 projects in that amount of time.  By dictating what the timeline would be, I was not allowing my learners to make an important decision, practice time-management, and have full ownership of their project.  

What I Would Do Today: Now, when I explain Genius Hour and how important purposeful planning is, I explain that it's important to let learners decide how long they think the project will take.  You might even provide options (3 weeks, 3 days or 3 months).  The goal is to encourage full ownership of the project and give them an opportunity to make decisions that will result in a willingness to invest.  If the project isn't completed by the date that they thought it would be, it's not a huge problem.  The date is just a target that we are trying to get as close to as possible. 

3.  I expected immediate buy-in.
What I Did: When I first learned about Genius Hour, I knew it was what my classroom had been missing.  I was so excited and expected my learners to react with the same excitement and buy-in that I had.  However, I didn't account for the fact that I was changing everything for them.  I was taking what was comfortable, familiar, and honestly, easy and replacing it with something that was uncomfortable, different, and more open-ended than anything they had experienced before.  As a result, they had questions, their parents had questions, and the excitement that I expected didn't happen right away.

What I Would Do Today: Instead of assuming that they would buy-in, I would make more of an effort to have honest conversations BEFORE implementing Genius Hour.  In looking back, helping both my learners and parents understand WHY Genius Hour was going to be a priority would have been a good idea.  Today, I would definitely schedule intentional conversations that would allow everyone involved to ask questions and provide feedback before full implementation.

4. I made assumptions based on my own perspectives.
What I Did: Often times, I made assumptions based on what I thought my learners might be thinking or feeling.  I assumed they were good if they weren't asking questions and that they understand the process.  However, looking back, I realize that often times, they needed me to ask them questions.  Sometimes, my learners didn't know what they didn't know.  Providing feedback and asking for feedback is a so important and should be a priority throughout the entire process of Genius Hour.

What I Would Do Today: Feedback would be my number one priority.  I would consistently ask my learners how it was going and check in with student conferencing and documentation of learning. After realizing the importance of documentation of learning and feedback, I created these slides.  Feel free to use them in any way that you'd like.  I also think that consistently asking for feedback through student conferencing or even Google Forms is a good idea.  Maybe ask the following questions...

• What is going well?
• What isn't going well?
• On a scale of 1-5, how would you rate your work on the project so far?
• What questions do you have for me?

5. I didn't provide a road map.
What I Did: When we first started Genius Hour, it was a mess!  I'm convinced that it was as messy as it was because we didn't have a road map.  Don't get me wrong, with or without a road map, it's going to be a little messy.  However, I was spending all of my time managing projects and I didn't have the time to actually connect with and create relationships with my learners the way that I had hoped.  Without a roadmap, my learners were never exactly sure what I expected or what they needed to accomplish along the way.

What I Would Do Today:  Upon realizing what a huge problem this was going to be, I created the 6 Ps of Genius Hour - Passion, Plan, Pitch, Project, Product, and Presentation.  After implementing this process, my learners began to understand what they were expected to accomplish while still being given the freedom to do it in a way that made sense for them.  Having a road map for Genius Hour changed everything for us and I would make this a priority today.  I began to spend my time weaving in connections to the standards, life-ready skills, and I was able to build the relationships with my learners that I knew were so important during this time.  The 6 Ps of Genius Hour made Genius Hour manageable for me and meaningful for my learners. 

 (If you'd like to learn more about the process, you can read the original blog post here or even enroll in my online course that will teach you EVERYTHING you need to know about the process and Genius Hour before getting started. 

BONUS MISTAKE 😊 - Our projects weren't driven by PURPOSE.
​
When I first began Genius Hour, our projects were just projects connected to what my learners liked to do or what they wanted to learn.  Along the way, I realized that their passion projects needed to be driven by purpose.  In other words, they needed to have a why behind the work that they were doing.  

Genius Hour can be about so much more than a product and presentation.  Ask your learners what change they'd like to create or what impact they'd like to have on the world around them.  You might also encourage them to write purpose statements for their projects like, "I want to learn about ____________________, so that I can _______________________."  That sentence helps them realize that they aren't just doing this because it's part of their day, but that there is purpose behind the work.  This makes a HUGE difference and reminds our learners that they can use what they do in the classroom to influence what happens outside of the classroom.

Well, there they are...five mistakes (and a bonus) that I made when I first implemented Genius Hour.  I was blessed to be able to realize most of these mistakes early on and make the changes that would be most beneficial for my learners.  Remember, Genius Hour is messy.  It won't be easy but it will be worth it.  You will make mistakes, but just like I did, you will learn from those mistakes and be better for them.  

I hope reading about my mistakes is helpful and gives you the confidence you need to dive in and make Genius Hour a priority in your classroom.   Passion-based learning is an opportunity for learners to make connections, practice life-ready-skills, and make an impact on the world around them.  It only makes sense that we make this type of learning part of the process.  

I'd love to hear about any mistakes that you've learned if you have implemented something like Genius Hour in your classroom.  Feel free to share in the comments below.
​

In The definition of interactive is “two people or things influencing or having an effect on each other.  If we want to have an effect on our learners, we have to intentionally understand where they are and what they need.  We should affect them through providing effective instruction and intervention.  They should affect us by providing the feedback that we need in order to do so.

Effective intervention IS impactful.

If intervention isn’t impactful, then it’s a waste of time.  The definition of impact is “to have a strong effect on someone or something.”  If what is being done or learned during an intervention time doesn’t leave an impact, our learners will forget what has been learned as soon as they walk out of the door.  We ultimately have to understand who they are, what they enjoy and how they learn to impact them.  Otherwise, we are simply spinning our wheels which will result in frustration for both the educator and the learner.  

Sometimes, learning can happen through direct teach or explicit instruction.  Other times, learning needs to happen through doing.  Regardless of how we make it happen, it’s important to not ask how will I teach, but how will they learn.  And, the reality is doing the same thing every day, such as sitting in front of a computer answering question after question, will not result in true understanding of a concept or standard.  

In order for the intervention to be effective, we consider what is being learned and why it is not being understood.  Is it because there is a lack of prior knowledge?  Is the learner missing necessary foundational pieces?  Why was the original opportunity to learn ineffective?  

The bottom line is that if we want intervention to have an impact we must ask ourselves, “How will they learn this particular concept or standard?"  What do I need to do as the educator and what do they need to do as the learner?  Asking these questions prioritizes the learning and helps us remember that simply because our students hear it, see it or even do it, that doesn't mean that they understood it.

I hope that these three perceptions of what intervention are helpful and at least us begin to intentionally think about why intervention is important and how we can do in a way that is most effective.  If you had to share what intervention is, what would you say?

*This is a 2-part post. The next post on my blog will include what intervention is NOT. 

When I reflect on my time in the classroom, I remember how many different labels each new class of learners brought to the table...gifted, dyslexic, ADHD, twice-exceptional, English language learner, I could go on and on.  We all know that this will be case this year as well.  I wanted to take a little bit of time to address our perspective as educators and how detrimental it can be when we allow labels to determine that perspective.  Let me explain...

You see, the reality is that when we find out that a learner is gifted, often times, our perspective shifts and we begin to focus on and notice their strengths.  When we find out that a learner struggles, our perspective shifts and we begin to focus on and notice their weaknesses. I believe that as educators, it's so important that we begin the year with a strengths-first mindset.  What I mean by that is that I believe that we should look for strengths BEFORE we begin to acknowledge and attempt to address weaknesses.  The reality is that without knowing a students' strengths, it will be really difficult to address their weaknesses anyway.

So, how do we do that?  How can we intentionally find ways to look beyond the label and begin to see every one of our learners in a way that will lead to success and confidence both in the classroom and beyond.  Below are four ways that I believe that we can make this a reality.  

1.  Recognize and VALUE both strengths and weaknesses.  While I think it's important that we identify strengths first, there is also value in helping our learners recognize and address their weaknesses.  I know so many learners that are working under the assumption that they don't have strengths or they don't have weaknesses. 

The reality is that every learner has both.  You will have students in your classroom that may never pass a worksheet or standardized test but they can go home and put a car back together or speak three languages.  So many of our learners have gifts that we will never see simply because we don't take the time to look beyond the school experience.  

The same is true for their weaknesses. Many of our learners are amazing students.  They have never made less than a 95 on any assignment and quite frankly, just know how to play the game really well.  However, some of those learners have no idea idea how to collaborate or make their own decisions.  It's important that while we want to identify and recognize strengths first, we don't forget how valuable it can be to understand our weaknesses and the role that our strengths play in addressing those weaknesses.

Finding ways this year to help our learners identify their strengths and the strengths of their peers will give them the tools that they need to address their weaknesses.  

One practical way to do this is to use Thrively at the beginning of the school year.  Encouraging every learner to take the Strengths Assessment within Thrively will help you, as the educator, and your students know their strengths, interests, and what they aspire to be.  Having this information will be beneficial all year along and provides a meaningful learning experience for the first few days of school. The Strengths Assessment takes about 45 minutes to complete and is perfect for grades 3-12.  I would suggest allowing students to work on this for approximately 10 minutes every day for the first week fo school.  At the end of the week, you will have the information that you need to know your students well and help them make connections to what is being learned.  

2.  Reinforce the right things.  So often, we reinforce what our learners produce or the outcome of a graded assignment or test.  I think that reinforcing the life-ready skills that it requires to earn a good grade, follow through with commitment to an assignment, or even overcome frustration when the outcome is less than what our learners desire is even more important.  You see, the more a gifted learner hears the words, "You are so smart," the more they begin to doubt themselves or feel like a disappointment when they don't feel smart.  They begin to think it's who they are.  When "smart" becomes your identity, there is no room for anything less than that.  The same is true for our learners who hear the opposite message.  If we continuously focus on their weaknesses or flaws, they will begin to think they can't move beyond those difficulties to accomplish whatever it is that they want achieve.  

However, using phrases like, "I really like the way that you collaborated with ____________ to learn more about this topic," or "I saw how you took time to reflect on what you did well and didn't do well today and I couldn't be any prouder.".  Maybe we say something like, "I realized that you made the decision to choose the more difficult assignment on the choice board today.  I'm so excited that you were willing to step outside of your comfort zone to challenge yourself."  Do you see the difference in these statements?  I love this idea and I think reinforcing the right things might be what many of our students need to see beyond their labels and into who they really are and what they need to get the most from any learning experience.

3.  Encourage productive struggle.  This is a hard one.  If you are like me, watching my students struggle was so difficult.  I often wanted to save the day or at least save them in that moment.  I felt like it was my job to keep them from struggling.  It wasn't until I began to realize that productive struggle actually provided my students with the skills that they would need to not only succeed but survive beyond the walls in the classroom that I began make productive struggle a priority.  When I did, it was difficult for me, my students, and their parents.  

We often consider struggle a sign of weakness or inability to move forward and nothing could be further from the truth.  Instead, struggle makes us stronger and helps us realize our ability to do hard things.  Our learners can often learn more through productive struggle than any assignment that they breeze through without any difficulty.  It's the struggle that prepares our learners for reality, helps them identify and value both their strengths and weaknesses, and gives them the tools that they will need to succeed beyond the walls of the classroom.

I think we can encourage productive struggle by designing for depth.  I talk about this often and how important it is that we consider both our snorkelers and our scuba divers in the classroom.  In a one size fits all classroom, many of our learners will never experience struggle.  If we are so focused on our struggling learners that we do not intentionally design for our scuba divers, they will simply show up every day, check off the boxes, and never fully engage in the learning.  Designing for depth provides an opportunity to EVERY learner to engage and be challenged.  To learn more, visit Design for Depth. 

4.  Create a culture of willingness.  Willingness is defined as the state of being prepared to do something or readiness.  Many times our learners are unwilling to do hard things because they are afraid of failure or lack the drive that is required to invest.  Regardless of a student's label or the labels that exist within our classroom, it's important that we build a culture that encourages a willingness to fail, a willingness to invest, and a willingness to dive deep into what is being learned.   

I often times think about surfing when I think about the willingness of our learners.  You never see a surfer just hanging out on their board with their knees locked and hands by their side.  Instead, they are completely immersed in the experience.  They are constantly challenged, knowing that they could fall off of the board at any time, and will need to be willing to get back on.  I think that's what learning should look like.  Our learners should be immersed in the experience as they are challenged each and every day.  

In order to accomplish a culture of willingness in any classroom, the reality is that we, as educators, must model a willingness to fail, willing to invest, and willing to dive deeper.  It's so important that our learners so what it looks like to take risks, invest as lifelong learners, and dive deep into new experiences and unfamiliar content.  

So, that's it...four ways to look beyond the label this school year.  Remember, it's imperative that we don't allow labels to determine our perspective.  Stay focused on who your learners really are, what they bring to the table, and how we can prepare them academically and for their lives beyond the walls of the classroom.  I believe that when we begin to do these things, our learners will respond with a willingness to invest.  

Have a wonderful 2021-2022 school year!  Let's do this!

I have to admit that I'm a big fan of the word purpose. Purpose should drive everything that we do in the classroom and give both ourselves and our learners a reason for the work.  The definition of purpose is "the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists."  

Our purpose has to go beyond "because it's included in our list of standards or because it's on the test".  Instead, the purpose has to connect to life beyond the classroom.  How can learners apply what they are learning to their right now?  While this is important for us to consider as we design an experience, I don't think it's necessary for us to make the connection for them.  Instead, I think we should challenge our learners to consider how they will apply what they've learned.  The question is, "How can we do this in a way that is both manageable and meaningful?".

Most learning experiences start with an objective or a statement that clearly defines the desired outcome.  I think objectives are important and help us, as educators, identify a target that we are trying to hit through the learning experience that we design.  However, objectives are rarely personal for our learners and making it personal means making it meaningful.

So, how do we do that?  I think that this can be achieved through encouraging our learners to create purpose statements at the end of a learning experience.  You could almost see objectives and purpose statements as bookends.  One at the beginning, one at the end, both holding the learning in place.  

I'm not going to lie.  I like simple.  Sometimes, the most simple tasks can be the most meaningful and are always the most manageable.  That being said, I think purpose statements can be as simple as asking our learners to complete this statement, "Today I learned _____________________, so that I can _____________________. " 

​The "so that" part of this statement is most important.  It's the connection between what they've learned in the classroom to what they experience beyond the walls of the classroom.  A learner's  "so that" might connect to sports, media, art, or something else that they see as a priority or interest.  The reality is that if we can help them realize how they might utilize what they've learned in a real way, the learning will be more meaningful and more likely to stick.  

Purpose statements can be written or documented using something like Google Slides.  I do think it's important that they are created in a place that can be reviewed over time so that learners can go back to acknowledge all they are they are able to DO because of all that they have LEARNED.  

I've really been thinking recently about adventure mindset and how it connects to our current circumstances in education.  In reading blogs,  listening to podcasts, and considering my own mindset, I've come to the conclusion that this mindset is what many of us need in order to move forward and innovate so that we are able to impact and engage today's learners.  

It's not a secret that I love words and I love to know what they mean and how they should be used.  Adventure is defined as "an unusual and exciting, typically hazardous, experience or activity."  Upon reading the definition, I immediately thought, "That doesn't sound like a good idea."  It was the word 'hazardous' that was causing concern.  That word can stir up fear or concern for those of us in education.  We are not looking to be a part of hazardous situations and tend to prefer the antonyms to the word such as safe and secure.  However, as I continued to explore the words, I found that hazardous actually means 'risky'.  And, let's be honest, risky is what we need right now.

I'm a huge fan of the television show, Monk.  I love his ability to use his greatest weakness as his greatest strength.  If you haven't seen the show, let me fill you in.  You see, Monk is a private investigator that suffers from OCD.  However, it's because of his OCD that he is able to notice details and find clues that no one else is able to identify.  In doing so, he solves crime after crime.  You may be asking yourself what in the world this has to do with education.  Let me explain...

A couple of years ago, our oldest child got his driver's license. I was SO nervous and a complete wreck knowing that he would be on the roads...alone.  I remember asking him to drive me on the interstate in Dallas because, I knew if he could handle Dallas traffic,  he could certainly handle the small highway he would use to get from our home to work and school.  He agreed but soon regretted that decision.  As soon as he began to drive, I had all sorts of advice.  "Slow down, use the blinker, how fast are you going, are you using your mirrors?"  I was like a parrot in his ear just chirping away.  Finally, he pulled over and said he couldn't drive with me providing constant direction.

Wow!  2020 was definitely a year to remember (or not).  While it went quickly in so many ways, it also went by so slowly.  It's easy to focus on all of the negative because, let's be honest, there was SO MUCH of it.  However, there were also many positive outcomes that will change the way that we do things from here on out.  ​

We've all talked about sustainable change in education for some time.  We've known that it was important for technology to become a priority and realized the importance of collaboration. However, knowing the importance of something and actually prioritizing those actions are two different things. 

2020 had a way of leveling the playing field.  Let me explain...there was no district, campus, or classroom that was totally prepared for what we've experienced.  There were no best practices, no blog posts, no YouTube videos, and no podcasts that you could listen regarding emergency remote learning during a pandemic.  I would go out on a limb and say that no one knew how it could be done in those first few days.  And then...magic began to happen.  Teachers began to try new things, experiment with new ideas, and share their experiences.  Some things worked, some things didn't, but the reality is that we will never be the same.